"

Why can’t I go to the Supreme Court and sit there with a gun and listen to the arguments? If a gun is so important to us on the street or someone’s home, why can’t I go to the Supreme Court and sit there with a gun? I’m not gonna shoot anyone. But, I have a right to that gun.

Why can’t I go see my congressman who doesn’t believe in gun laws? Why can’t I carry my gun into congressmen’s offices or go to his home and knock on his door and say, ‘Don’t be worried. I have a gun. You want me to have a gun.’ Why is it they want to be protected by all the federal money … to protect all the federal bureaucrats, but when it comes to us in the city there’s no protection?

"

Chicago Mayor Richard Daley on the likely overturn of Chicago’s 28 year old handgun ban by the SCOTUS.  More from the Sun-Times

(via absurdlakefront/bnf)

(via tylercoates)

  1. steph reblogged this from tedr
  2. stillastar reblogged this from tylercoates
  3. cubicleparty said: He’s missing the point. This is about home ownership, not public places.
  4. theverbald reblogged this from tylercoates
  5. turnabout reblogged this from tylercoates
  6. themmases reblogged this from absurdlakefront
  7. tedr reblogged this from ericmortensen
  8. jeffcagle reblogged this from newsandbooze
  9. philk reblogged this from tylercoates
  10. newsandbooze reblogged this from ericmortensen
  11. generic1 reblogged this from southpol
  12. subpopculttrash reblogged this from reactorboy
  13. other-stuff reblogged this from abcsoupdot
  14. vruz reblogged this from southpol
  15. activitygrrrl reblogged this from reactorboy
  16. abcsoupdot reblogged this from southpol
  17. reactorboy reblogged this from southpol
  18. ericmortensen reblogged this from southpol
  19. nebraskagasm reblogged this from tylercoates
  20. devmonster reblogged this from absurdlakefront
  21. southpol reblogged this from tylercoates